.

.

.

 GRO Applications» 

  Case studies available:

 » GRO, DRO, TPH in Water

 » EDRO in Soil

 » PAHs in Soil

 » EPH in Soil

 » TPH Oil & Grease

 » Oil Forensics Analysis

 » TPH Fingerprinting

 » UVF-3100 Applications

 » TD-500D Applications

 

 Home Page»

 What's New?»

 Products & Rentals»

 Lab Services»

 Case Studies»

 UVF Technology»

 EPA Performance»

 Case Studies»

 Test Procedures»

 Contact Us»

 

     These case studies show the performance using Sitelab’s UVF-3100 analyzer testing gasoline range organic hydrocarbons.  This includes benzene, xylene, BTEX and other volatile petroleum compounds in the GRO or VPH C6 to C10 hydrocarbon range. 

     When calibrated using Sitelab's GRO calibration kit (CAL-025), the UVF analyzer produces test results that correlate well to laboratory regulatory methods using GC instrumation.  Both the UVF-3100A and UVF-3100D models are fitted with special optical filters sensitive to hydrocarbons commonly found in gasoline, jet fuel, diesel fuel, gas condensates and many other light-refined petroleum products.

 
 

Performance Study at UST Site

Evaluation study performed by customer testing soil samples at a former gas station in Massachusetts.  They wanted to know how Sitelab's GRO test compares to two different laboratory methods, GRO and VPH, commonly used in the United States and elseware.  Sitelab correlated well to both methods.

 

Click image for details>>

 

See case study

 

Still using a PID to Screen Soils?

"Jar Headspace" using photo ionization detectors (PIDs) is common practice for field screening soils contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons.  PIDs detect air vapors in soil for volatile organic compounds.  Despite their popularity, however, PIDs can often give false readings.  Data shown here compares GRO to PID concentrations testing soils contaminated by weathered gasoline.  Not surprisingly, results did not correlate very well.
 
Soil borings are split open and grab samples are collected...


Grab samples were collected from borings in 1 to 2 foot intervals and then screened using a PID and UVF to delineate the vertical subsurface extent of contamination.

 
Accuracy Testing GRO in Water

Sitelab's UVF-3100 performed well testing blind, NELAC certified, spiked water samples provided by Environmental Resource Associates (Arvada, CO).  Results were compared to the GRO in water concentrations reported by 83 participating laboratories using a variety of gas chromatography methods.

 

 

VOA vial containing GRO water sample...Click here for procedure

    »GRO in Water Study Results
    »Water Performance Studies
 

U.S. EPA GRO in Soil Performance

During the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's TPH in Soil Evaluation Study, a group of soils were spiked in triplicate with weathered gasoline having variable concentrations.  Weathered gasoline contains BTEX and other volatile petroleum hydrocarbons, which make up the GRO fraction found in total petroleum hydrocarbons.  Results were compared to a certified laboratory who performed SW-846 Method 8015B.  EPA evaluated Sitelab's UVF-3100A and six other manufacturers during the program.   

 

 

 

Innovative Technology Verification Report No. EPA/600/R-01/080

 

Both Sitelab and the laboratory GC method have the ability to measure GRO and DRO separately in TPH.  Sitelab was the only participant who's field device is capable of performing these two tests.

U.S. EPA Soils from Air Force Base

Soils from Kelly Air Force Base in San Antonio, Texas, were analyzed for GRO as part of the EPA’s TPH in Soil Evaluation Study.  Samples were collected from an active underground storage tank (UST) farm, that serves as the government vehicle refueling station at the base.  Soils tested consisted of sandy clays with silty sand and gravel.  EPA reported that for GRO measurement bias "seven of the eight UVF-3100A results were within 50 percent of the reference method result," page 66.

Samples collected from other environmental sites located in Indiana and California were included during the study (87 samples in total).  TPH was reported by adding the GRO and DRO concentrations together.

  

 

 

Photo of Sitelab and other developers during final demonstration...

 

Sitelab technician tests samples with EPA’s contractor, Tetra Tech, observing during the final demonstration at the Port Hueneme Navy Base in southern California.

 

 

»Download EPA's Evaluation Report

 

 

»See more EPA evaluation studies highlighting Sitelab's performance

 

  
   See case studies    See performance study    See case studies    See oil forensics

  Welcome to site-lab.com!    HOME   I   WHAT'S NEW   I   PRODUCTS & SERVICES   I  CASE STUDIES   UV FLUORESCENCE   I  TEST PROCEDURES   I  CONTACT US

© 2016  Sitelab Corporation   USA   All Rights Reserved      site-lab.com      Sitelabcorp.com     SitelabCorporation.com